This is an excerpt from a paper written for York University Faculty of Law.
Dividends from a subsidiary corporation to its parent corporation are often though to be tax-free – however this is not a safe assumption. The simple movement of dividends from a subsidiary to its parent corporation using the tax exemptions available under subsection 112(1) or 84(3) of the Income Tax Act (the Act) can be contentious and convoluted when considering the anti-abusive rules in section 55 of the Act. That section allows safe income to move tax-free from a subsidiary to its parent using the relevant provisions subject to safe income rules. However, the seemingly different interpretations of the legislation and related judicial orbiter have put the CRA at odds with the broader tax community on what adjustments (if any) should be made to income, to arrive at safe income as determined in section 55 of the Act. As such, what may be thought to be a tax-free intercorporate dividend could be deemed a taxable capital gain. This confusion has become more intricate after the CRA’s flip flop on their policy that resulted from their changing interpretation of the Kruco case.
Section 55 of the Act has proved to be a convoluted provision and adds significant risk to the taxation of corporate reorganizations when not given appropriate attention. Seemingly inconsistent interpretations by the CRA and its policies and court rulings pose challenges to identify conditions to qualify for tax-deferred reorganizations that specifically utilize tax-free intercorporate dividend transactions.
In reaction to the Kruco case, the CRA’s most recent policy is now to deduct non-deductible expenditures when computing safe income. This research will review at a high level if the adjustments in paragraphs 55((5)(b) and (c) consider non-deductible expenses and the FCA obiter that CRA has based its revised policy on.
The thesis statement to be presented will be, CRA’s contentious position on the required deduction of non-deductible expenses in computing safe income on hand attributable the shares on which intercompany dividends are paid is based on obiter taken out of context and not supported by legislation or the courts.
The taxation of shareholders and business income necessitates a statutory understanding of the Act along with an appreciation of the object, spirit, and purpose of the relevant provisions. As an anti-avoidance provision, the objective of subsection 55(2) is to prevent the conversion of taxable capital gains to tax free inter-corporate dividends. For a better understanding of what this subsection attempts to prevent, an understanding of subsections 112(1), 84(3) and Part IV tax are required, along with a review of pre-Kruco cases to establish a basis for understanding past CRA positions on section 55 as well as the courts interpretations leading to their decision in Kruco.
112(1) Deduction of Taxable Dividends
Subsection 112(1) discusses the deduction of taxable dividends received by a corporation resident in Canada. The rule states
“Where a corporation in a taxation year has received a taxable dividend from
(a) a taxable Canadian corporation, or
(b) a corporation resident in Canada (other than a non-resident-owned investment corporation or a corporation exempt form tax under this Part) and controlled by it,
an amount equal to the dividend may be deducted from the income of the receiving corporation for the year for the purpose of computing its taxable income.”
This subsection simply allows a deduction for intercorporate dividends between a parent corporation and its subsidiary. Broadly speaking, the rule prevents a double taxation of the same income. A corporation that has issued a dividend would have done so after the payment of corporate tax. If that dividend were received by another corporation and was taxable, the same income would essentially be taxed twice at the corporate level.
84(3) Deemed Dividend on Share Redemption
Subsection 84(3) considers the redemption of shares in which the amount paid on that redemption is more than the paid-up capital of those shares. Paragraph 84(3)(a) determines a corporation is deemed to have paid for shares of capital stock that are redeemed, acquired or cancelled. This amount is calculated as the difference between the amount paid and the paid-up capital of the shares redeemed, acquired, or cancelled. Paragraph 84(3)(b) then determines the person who disposed of the shares is deemed to have received a taxable dividend for that same amount. The rule determines that a corporation that repurchases its shares for more than the paid-up capital amount via redemption, acquisition or cancellation is deemed to pay a dividend for the amount paid more than the paid-up capital. However, subsection 112(1) makes an intercorporate dividend tax-free by permitting the corporate taxpayer to take an equivalent deduction.
The operation of subsections 112(1) and 84(3) are subject to the anti-avoidance rules in subsection 55(2), which converts certain dividends that are received tax free into taxable capital gains.
Part IV Tax
As Corporations are generally entitled to deduct dividend income received pursuant to subsection 112(1) when calculating their taxable income, Part IV tax imposes a refundable tax that is only recovered when the dividend is distributed via a dividend to the corporation’s shareholders. Part IV of the Act contains a wide-ranging system intended to avoid the deferral advantages that arise from the payment of portfolio dividends to private corporations.
Subsection 186 (1) applies Part IV tax when the dividend received is from a corporation that is not connected with the payer corporation or where the dividend received by a connected corporation resulted in a refund of RDTOH.
Subsection 186(4) defines connected corporation to include the corporation that received the dividend having more than 10% of the issued share capital and those shares having a fair market value greater than 10% of all the issued shares of the payer corporation, or where the recipient corporation controls the payer corporation as defined in paragraph 251(5)(b) of the Act. Subsection 186(2) determines when a corporation is “controlled” for the purposes of subsection 186(4), and generally requires more than 50 % of the issued share capital in the subsidiary that have full voting rights to belongs to the other corporation, to persons with whom the other corporation does not deal at arm’s length, or to the other corporation and persons with whom the other corporation does not deal at arm’s length.
Section 55 is designed to prevent the transformation of a taxable capital gain into a tax-free inter-corporate dividend. The rule is aimed towards transactions or a series of transactions structured to utilize the intercorporate dividend exemptions in subsection 112(1) and deemed dividends under subsection 84(3) that would reduce or eliminate a capital gain that would have otherwise been realized on a disposition of the shares of a corporation at fair market value.
Transactions that are particularly abusive in the CRA’s opinion include an arm’s length sale of shares of a corporation, before, on, or after which, the corporation (or a corporation which acquires the shares), pays a dividend that is not subject to tax which represents all or part of a capital gain which would otherwise have been realized on a sale of the shares.
Section 55(2) includes a results test for redemptions under subsection 84(3) as well as a purpose test for dividends issued under subsection 112(1).
In cases where only subsection 112(1) applies to intercorporate dividends, the purpose of the dividend will need to be determined. Where the purpose is to minimize the tax on a capital gain that would otherwise be incurred, the purpose would be offside and deem the entire dividend to be a taxable capital gain.
Where subsection 84(3) applies a deemed dividend from the redemption, acquisition or cancellation of shares, the result of the transaction would be considered in the application of subsection 55(2). In this case, where the result of the transaction is the reduction or elimination of a taxable capital gain, the entire dividend is deemed to be a taxable capital gain.
Each of these transactions finds some alleviation under paragraph 55(5)(f) , which allows the portion of dividend attributable to safe income to be designated as an intercorporate dividend, with the remainder deemed as a taxable capital gain.
Safe income is generally the cumulative after-tax income retained within a corporation that is responsible for all or part of a gain on a share sale.
New Rules on 55(2)
The substantial overhaul of subsection 55(2) that affect intercorporate dividends received after April 20, 2015 include amendments to retain the principal framework of this subsection, however, broadly expand the occurrences when the provision may apply. This includes two new purpose tests and restrictions on related party transactions.
The revised subsection 55(3) exception now only applies with respect to a dividend realized on a share redemption under subsection 84(2) and (3).
The purpose test detailed in 55(2.1)(b)(i) has been amended to include both payment and the receipt of the dividend. The CRA has further provided direction that states where a dividend is paid pursuant to a well-established policy of paying regular dividends and the amount of the dividend does not exceed the amount that one would normally expect to receive as a reasonable dividend income return on equity on a comparable listed share issued by a comparable payer corporation in the same industry, the CRA would consider the purpose of the payment of such dividend is not described in proposed paragraph 55(2.1)(b). As such, dividends that have historically been paid will not be offside the purpose test where applicable.
Safe income is generally the taxable income earned or realized after 1971 and subject to adjustments noted in paragraphs 55(5)(b) and (c). As such, safe income is the amount of tax-free intercorporate dividends available, that may be paid without triggering a taxable capital gain under subsection 55(2). The deemed taxable capital gain is therefore the amount attributable to something other than income as determined by a safe income calculation.
Safe income is the tax retained earnings of the dividend paying corporation realized after 1971 and prior to the receipt of the dividend by the recipient. Subsection 55(2) is not applicable if the entire amount of the dividend is attributable to safe income. However, if a portion of the dividend is attributable to something other than safe income, the entire amount received by the recipient corporation is deemed not to be a dividend, but rather a taxable capital gain. That said, paragraph 55(5)(f) provides reprieve by designating the safe income portion of the dividend as an inter-corporate tax-free dividend so that only the part of the dividend which is not attributable to safe income is treated as a realized capital gain. Paragraph 55(5)(f) had originally required that the designation be made at the time of filing of the tax return for the year in which the dividend was received.
55(5) Adjustments to Taxable Income to Arrive at Safe Income
Subsection 55(5) provides instructions to calculate safe income. Paragraph 55(5)(b) refers to corporations that are not private corporations and 55(5)(c) referrers to private corporations. The formula therein determines safe income to be income earned or realized by a corporation with the assumption that no amounts were deducted by reasons of section 37.1 (for taxation years ended before 1995), or paragraph 20(1)(gg) of the Act. The wording of this subsection has been the subject of a number of litigations brought forth by the CRA, with jurisprudence determining the calculation should start with taxable income and only be adjusted for subsections 37.1 and paragraph 20(1)(gg).
Paragraph 20(1)(gg) discusses disability-related modifications to buildings and was repealed in 1994.
Section 37.1 discusses additional allowances for scientific research and experimental development and was repealed in 1998.
The safe income amount after the repealed dates would be limited to the taxable income of the corporation. Specifically, “the income earned or realized by a corporation … is deemed to be its income for the period.”
Deduction of Non-deductible Expenses
The words ‘non-deductible expenses’ do not appear within subsection 55(5), the authority for the calculation of safe income. The practice of deducting ‘non-deductible expenses’ originated from the CRA original interpretation as detailed in Robertson’s Rules and in the concept of safe income on hand.
So what now?
There is always risk in taking a tax filing position, and if you truly want to know if a dividend issued by a subsidiary to a parent company, a safe income calculation would be necessary.
Income Tax Act, RSC 1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.), as amended (herein referred to as “the Act). Unless otherwise stated statutory references in this paper are to the Act.
Canada, Canada Revenue Agency, Income Tax Technical News No. 37 (Archived), Safe Income Calculation – Treatment of Non-Deductible Expenses, February 15, 2008
Kruco Inc. v. The Queen, 2001 CanLII 565 and Canada v. Kruco Inc., 2003 FCA 284 CanLII
Supra Note 5
Paragraph 55(5)(b) and (c)
Part IV Tax on Taxable Dividends Received by Private Corporations
Supra Note 1
Refundable dividend tax on hand
Supra Note 9, editors’ comments
Grant Thornton LLP, New rules for inter-corporate dividends, March 2016
Kenneth Keung, Canadian Tax Foundation, Selected Safe Income Issues: Relevant Period, Global Computation and Allocation, 2017 Prairie Provinces Tax Conference
CRA document 2005-0112141E5
Thomas E. McDonnell, Larua J. Stoddard, Michael J. Welters, Joel Nitikman and Lynn Jenkins, 53 Canada Tax Journal 754 (2005)
Supra Note 21
John R. Robertson, Capital Gains Strips: A Revenue Canada Perspective on the Provisions of Section 55, in Report of Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Tax Conference, 1981 Conference Report (Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation, 1982), 81 – 109
This information is for discussion purposes only and should not be considered professional advice. There is no guarantee or warrant of information on this site and it should be noted that rules and laws change regularly. You should consult a professional before considering implementing or taking any action based on information on this site. Call our team for a consultation before taking any action. © 2021 Shajani LLP.
Shajani LLP is a CPA Calgary, Edmonton and Red Deer firm and provides Accountant, Bookkeeping, Tax Advice and Tax Planning services.